SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP018 ARLP018 Propagation de K7RA ZCZC AP18 QST de W1AW Propagation Forecast Bulletin 18 ARLP018 From Tad Cook, K7RA Seattle, WA May 3, 2013 To all radio amateurs SB PROP ARL ARLP018 ARLP018 Propagation de K7RA Solar activity made a healthy jump over the past week, with average daily sunspot numbers up over 30 points to 120.9, and average daily solar flux increasing over 27 points to 136.5. The most active day for geomagnetic indices was May 1, when the planetary A index reached 21 and the high-latitude college A index (measured near Fairbanks, Alaska) was a whopping 57. That number has been higher, but only twice in the past six months, when it was 64 on March 1 and 79 on March 17. The latest forecast has solar flux at 155 on May 3-4, 150 on May 5-6, 145 on May 7-9, then 140, 125 and 120 on May 10-12, 125 on May 13-15, 120 on May 16-17, then 125, 120, and 130 on May 18-20, 135 on May 21-22 and 130 on May 23-24. Predicted planetary A index is 8 on May 3-4, 12 on May 5, 8 on May 6, 5 on May 7-20, then 15, 10 and 15 on May 21-23, and then 5 forever after that. This is from a 45 day forecast, so we won't really see quiet conditions forever, but the forecast ends on June 16 with planetary A index of 5 until then. F.K. Janda, OK1HH has another short forecast for geomagnetic conditions, like last week. He sees the geomagnetic field quiet to unsettled May 3-10, quiet to active May 11-12, and quiet to unsettled May 13-19. That's it! NASA released a new solar cycle prediction on May 1, but it wasn't really new. These arrive at the start of every month, and remain the same since March 1. On March 1, 2013 the prediction for the smoothed International Sunspot Number at the cycle peak shifted from 69 to 66 for Fall 2013. The 2013 Autumnal Equinox begins in about four months and three weeks. This week the May 2013 issue of CQ Magazine arrived, and across the top of the cover was this headline: "Another Double-Peak Sunspot Cycle?" We certainly hope so. Time to review our 3-month moving average of sunspot numbers, which has increased. The average daily sunspot number for February, March and April was 85.2. The average daily sunspot number for the three month periods centered on September 2012 through March 2013 were 81.2, 82.3, 74.4, 82.8, 73.6, 80.7 and 85.2. This is a moving average, so 81.2 was the average for August through October 2012, 82.3 was September through November 2012 and so on. But this involves a bit of cherry picking of the data, as the three previous period's averages were 96.5, 91.9 and 89.9. The average sunspot number for the month of April was 112.8, for March it was 81.1 and February was 60.1. Eric Ferguson, VE3CR of Burlington, Ontario sent his father-in-law Bruce Jones an article about solar flares, and they both wondered why there are no solar flares at the Sun's poles. I passed this question on to Robert Steenburgh, KA8JBY who is a Senior Space Weather Forecaster at the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center. Robert wrote, "Flares are thought to originate from the deformation of magnetic field lines which break and reconnect. There is a latitudinal band in which this magnetic flux emergence (and hence sunspot formation) and deformation occurs. "Sunspots typically form at mid-latitudes (equatorward of around 40 degrees) at the beginning of the solar cycle, and the breeding grounds drift towards the equator over the course of the cycle. This behavior is attributed to the solar dynamo. See http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/dynamo.shtml. "A cartoon depiction of the dynamo process is here: http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/144061main_CycleDiagramLG.jpg "You can find a paper on flare distribution for Solar Cycle 23 here: http://www.ias.ac.in/jaa/junsep2006/JAA10.pdf "There were 4 flares identified poleward of 50 degrees latitude in that paper, out of a total of 20,186. "The poles are usually dominated by coronal holes and 'open' magnetic field lines that extend out into the heliosphere. So the mechanisms for flare formation are generally absent." David Moore sent a link to a NASA video showing ten coronal mass ejections over five days in April: http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery/index.html?media_id=162261751 Mike Snyder, KN8J who lives a few miles south of Harrisville, West Virginia in EM99lf wrote this morning, May 3: "My wife and I are early risers. I mean real early. We're up about 3AM. Generally speaking, 3 to 5AM produces some fair DX for me. "Lately it's been getting a bit better on the 20 and 30 meter bands. The South Pacific is usually open at these hours. I've managed a couple QRP contacts with Hawaii. I've noticed parts of Europe open as well. I had a solid QSO with OK1HB from the Czech Republic on 14.062MHz. I was running 100 watts barefoot for this one. "This morning I finally worked a new one: A35JP in Tonga on 14.003 MHz running up two at 0736 UTC. "Well, gotta go...someone just spotted FO/KH0PR!" Mike runs a Cushcraft A4 antenna on a 40 foot tower with the two rear elements askew due to high winds last month. On 160 and 30 meters he uses a fan inverted vee dipole at 35 feet. He sent this final note: "Just worked A35UD on 10.108 MHz at 1010 UTC. Too bad I gotta go to work now!" If you would like to make a comment or have a tip for our readers, email the author at, k7ra@arrl.net. For more information concerning radio propagation, see the ARRL Technical Information Service web page at http://arrl.org/propagation-of-rf-signals. For an explanation of the numbers used in this bulletin, see http://arrl.org/the-sun-the-earth-the-ionosphere. An archive of past propagation bulletins is at http://arrl.org/w1aw-bulletins-archive-propagation. More good information and tutorials on propagation are at http://k9la.us/. Monthly propagation charts between four USA regions and twelve overseas locations are at http://arrl.org/propagation. Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL bulletins are at http://arrl.org/bulletins. Sunspot numbers for April 25 through May 1 were 93, 104, 100, 97, 136, 165, and 151, with a mean of 120.9. 10.7 cm flux was 119.2, 121.9, 127, 131.7, 142.4, 154.4, and 159.2, with a mean of 136.5. Estimated planetary A indices were 8, 17, 6, 5, 5, 7, and 21, with a mean of 9.9. Estimated mid-latitude A indices were 14, 18, 6, 4, 5, 6, and 16, with a mean of 9.9. NNNN