KC2UGV
| Joined: | Thu, Mar 27th 2014, 20:17 | Roles: | N/A | Moderates: | N/A |
Latest Posts
| Topic | Author | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| QRZ.com can now sign LoTW logs | K0STK | on 23/5/14 |
| This is a good thing. The largest hurdle to doing LoTW is getting the cert. As long as LoTW requires digital signing of logs, using a single-use PKI program, nothing will solve that. This solves one problem: Moving TQSL certs around to machines. I need to keep 4 installations of TQSL in sync with each other, which is a general, all around, pain in the arse. Not anymore: I submit my keys to QRZ, and they hang onto them for me. Digitally singing logs is a silly requirement anyways. All it does is prove who SUBMITTED logs. And, do we really need to do that, beyond user name/password auth? |
||
| LOTW Complaints | W4RIG | on 20/5/14 |
| unzip is a free (Free as in free beer, and free as in freedom): http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/unzip.htm | ||
| D-Star - Is it worth it? | KD5HIJ | on 20/5/14 |
| I personally do not think it's worth while. Not enough activity in the area, and it's a closed proprietary system, so, I wouldn't shell out extra just for D-Star. | ||
| Plans for LoTW? | NK7Z | on 28/3/14 |
| LoTW should just do away with the signing requirement for logs of your own that you upload. That would resolve about 90% of the frustration people have with the app. |
||
