f8dql
| Joined: | Mon, May 28th 2012, 12:35 | Roles: | N/A | Moderates: | N/A |
Latest Topics
| Topic | Created | Posts | Views | Last Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Can I trust in LoTW? No! | Jul 26th 2014, 15:10 | 4 | 10,991 | on 22/11/19 |
Latest Posts
| Topic | Author | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Can I trust in LoTW? No! | f8dql | on 30/7/14 |
| Hi N1NN, Thanks for your reply. My total QSO number has raised after the latest LoTW crash without any new upload from my part. Plus, as an example, the logging software I use does not allow a QSO to be recorded on 60M band! This band is not granted in France. It is consequently impossible to have signed then uploaded a QSO on that band. By the way, I am really surprised there is no coherency check on LoTW, some QSO are recorded with a band which does not match the frequency: YI9ZF 2004-06-14 20:24:48 20M CW 10.107000 73 |
||
| Can I trust in LoTW? No! | f8dql | on 26/7/14 |
| Hi, Since the latest crash one week or so ago, the total QSO recorded is bigger than my total number of QSO. I have downloaded the entre LoTW log to compare with mine, and I realized there is a mess! Here are a few examples of almost-duplicates: CS0RCL/P 2002-07-07 13:15:00 60M SSB 5.288000 CS0RCL/P 2002-07-07 13:15:00 15M CW 21.008000 Same date, same time, different band (one not allowed in F) and mode... YI9ZF 2004-06-14 20:24:48 20M CW 10.107000 YI9ZF 2004-06-14 20:24:48 30M CW 10.107000 OH0/SM0JHF 2004-06-14 20:58:26 20M CW 10.109000 OH0/SM0JHF 2004-06-14 20:58:26 30M CW 10.109000 Worse. Same date, same time, different band but same frequency! I have a dozen of such entries. Of course I have raised a ticket, which was never answered... 73 |
||
