= NOW 40 WPM = RELAY, BUT IM AFRAID TO USE IT, BECAUSE THE RELAY DOES NOT GROUND THE RECEIVER WHEN TRANSMITTING. AM I SAFE USING EITHER ONE OF THE TWO RELAYS, OR SHOULD I ACQUIRE A TUBE TYPE RECEIVER? A ONE PROBLEM IS THAT NO ONE IS SURE ABOUT THE SAFE INPUT LEVEL OF MODERN GEAR, BECAUSE THE MANUFACTURERS DONT SPECIFY, ALTHOUGH THEY MIGHT ANSWER IF ASKED ABOUT A PARTICULAR TRANSCEIVER ON A PARTICULAR BAND. WE CAN BELIEVE THAT AN INPUT OF 10 DBM IS SAFE, BECAUSE DURING QST PRODUCT REVI JOEL R. HALLAS, W1ZR, W1ZR ARRL. ORG THE DOCTOR IS IN SOME ANTENNAS NEED LOW RESISTANCE CONNECTIONS TO BE EFFECTIVE Q A FRIEND AND I HAVE GOTTEN VERY INTERESTED IN BUILDING SMALL TRANSMITTING HF LOOP ANTENNAS. IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE AMATEUR LITERATURE THAT DISCUSSES HOW TO IMPLEMENT VERY LOW RESISTANCE M LEVEL RF CONNECTIONS? I AM REASONABLY UP TO DATE ON WHAT HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN AMATEUR RADIO PERIODICALS ON SMALL LOOP ANTENNAS GOING BACK TO TED HARTS, W5QJR, ARTICLE, SMALL, HIGH EFFICIENCY LOOP ANTENNAS, IN THE JUNE 1986 ISSUE OF QST BUT I DONT TRULY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS NEEDED FOR JOINTS THAT DONT TURN THE HIGH RF CURRENT INTO HEAT. A FIRST, THANK YOU TO SENIOR LAB ENGINEER ZACK LAU, W1VT, FOR HIS COMMENTS ON THIS. THE LOSS COULD BE INDIRECTLY MEASURED BY CALCULATING THE BANDWIDTH OF THE LOOP THE NARROWER THE BANDWIDTH, THE BETTER. ZACKS GUESS IS THAT THE BEST APPROACH IS TO BRAZE EVERYTHING ONCE, THEN CAREFULLY SAND AND POLISH ALL JOINTS TO A MIRROR LIKE SURFACE. ANOTHER PARAMETER IS THE NEEDED DURATION OF THE CONNECTION, BECAUSE MOST CONNECTION ARRANGEMENTS DEGRADE OVER TIME. SOME MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS THAT DEGRADE DUE TO OXIDATION CAN HAVE THEIR RESISTANCE GROWTH DELAYED BY A COMBINATION OF CONDUCTIVE ANTICORROSION GREASE ON THE SURFACE AND COVERING THE JOINT WITH SOMETHING THAT KEEPS NEW OXYGEN AWAY. SOME ANTENNA MATERIALS, PARTICULARLY ALUMINUM, LOSE THEIR CONNECTIVITY DUE TO SHRINKING UNDER PRESSURE. IN THE 1950S, THE WIRE UNDER SCREW TERMINALS GOT THINNER OVER TIME AND THE RESISTANCE WENT UP, RESULTING IN HOUSE FIRES. THIS WAS ALSO A PROBLEM WITH RADIO EQUIPMENT THAT USED ALUMINUM RIVETS TO ATTACH THINGS, SUCH AS TUBE SOCKETS, TO STEEL CHASSIS. ALMOST ALL RADIOS FROM THOSE TIMES THAT I HAVE RESTORED HAD DC RESISTANCES BETWEEN THE SOCKET AND ITS GROUND CONNECTIONS, AND THE ACTUAL CHASSIS GROUND, IN THE SINGLE DIGIT OHMS RANGE PERFECT FOR CAUSING ALL MANNER OF PROBLEMS. BRAZING OR WELDING MAY BE THE BEST OPTION. SOLDERING IS CLOSE, BUT DIFFICULT FOR SOME METALS, AND UNPROTECTED JOINTS DEGRADE WITH EXPOSURE OVER TIME. ANY MECHANICAL CONNECTION INVOLVING ALUMINUM BEAM CLAMPS OR OTHER JOINTS SHOULD BE TIGHTENED PERIODICALLY AND APPROPRIATE COMPOUNDS APPLIED TO ALL MECHANICAL JOINTS, AS WELL AS ELECTRICAL INSULATING MATERIAL TO PROTECT THE CONNECTIONS. Q A FRIEND HAS AN 18 FOOT OPEN BOAT THAT HE HOPES TO PUT ON THE AIR ON 60 METERS. HE WAS WONDERING WHAT KIND OF COUNTERPOISE TO USE WITH HIS WHIP ANTENNA. HE WOULD NOT WANT TO DRILL THROUGH OR MAKE ANY MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE HULL. TRAILING WIRES SEEMS = END OF 40 WPM TEXT = QST DE W1AW <